Home > Middle East > The Holes in the Iran Nuke Report: Just how far-fetched are Iran’s claims that the IAEA Directorate General is politically compromised? | Counterpunch

The Holes in the Iran Nuke Report: Just how far-fetched are Iran’s claims that the IAEA Directorate General is politically compromised? | Counterpunch

Much of the U.S. media, with instigation from hawkish voices in Israel, France, the U.K. and the U.S., has been whipped into an anti-Iran frenzy over the last week surrounding the release of a much-ballyhooed report from the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The report, which expresses the Director General’s “serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear program,” has been dismissed by Iranian leaders as politically biased in favor of the U.S. Administration, and lacking in any direct evidence of a weapons program.

In a sentence now removed from the web version of the article in which it appeared (it can still be found in external links to the article, like the one here), the New York Times’ Robert Worth described the Iranian response  thus:

Professing outrage over the release of a United Nations report on Iranian nuclear ambitions, Iran’s leaders escalated their anti-American vitriol on Wednesday, calling the report a fabrication, denouncing its chief author as a Washington stooge and vowing that their country would not be bullied into abandoning its nuclear program.

V. Noah Gimbel is a contributor to Foreign Policy in Focus, writing from Spain

For more on this story, visit: The Holes in the Iran Nuke Report » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

What is 15 + 14 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
I footnotes