Home > Disarmament > Banning nuclear weapons is crucial for global health | Opinion, The Guardian

Banning nuclear weapons is crucial for global health | Opinion, The Guardian

by Ira Helfand, Tilman Ruff, Sir Michael Marmot Frances Hughes and Michael Moore (no not that Michael Moore)

Before this year ends, the United Nations general assembly can take a decisive step toward ending one of the most urgent threats to public health and human survival in the world today. UN member states can and must mandate negotiations on a new treaty that prohibits nuclear weapons.

The dangers posed by these weapons are utterly unacceptable, and the only sure way to prevent an unthinkable catastrophe is to eliminate them completely. That’s not only possible, it’s essential and long overdue.

A single nuclear weapon can destroy a city and kill most of its people, making it impossible to provide meaningful aid to the survivors. A nuclear war could kill many more people in an hour than were killed during the entire second world war.

Ira Helfand and Tilman Ruff are co-presidents of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War; Sir Michael Marmot is president of the World Medical Association; Frances Hughes is CEO of the International Council of Nurses; Michael Moore is president of the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Read the whole opinion piece here: Banning nuclear weapons is crucial for global health | Opinion | The Guardian

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

What is 14 + 5 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)
I footnotes